- About us
- Our people
- Our expertise
- Strategic IP
- Practice groups
- Case studies
- Knowledge bank
- Contact us
13 November 2017
The Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017 came into force on 1 October 2017. The new law comes as the result of a consultation process triggered by the Law Commission in April 2013.
UK law provides for protection against groundless threats of infringement proceedings by the holder of a patent, trade mark, unregistered design right or registered design. It is worth highlighting that copyright and unregistered trade mark rights are still not subject to threats provisions.
For example, if a registered trade mark proprietor sends a letter to a seller of an allegedly infringing product, this threat could constitute an unjustified threat and a court action for unjustified threats for trade mark infringement could consequently arise. In this scenario, the threats provisions would not catch threats made to primary infringers (i.e. manufacturers or importers).
Where a threats action is successful, the claimant will be entitled to a declaration from the court that the threats lacked justification, damages and an injunction to prevent further threats.
The unjustified threats provisions have been subject to much scrutiny, as the resulting law change exemplifies, and seeks to balance the interests of IP rights holders when enforcing their rights and those of parties who may be subjected to unjustified threats.
The new regime attempts to make clear what right holders can communicate to alleged infringers and where threats to secondary infringers (e.g. retailers) would be justified.
These are the key changes:
An attempt to clarify the law in this area is welcomed. Like all new legal provisions, development through litigation and subsequent interpretation will be key to our understanding the full extent of the changes. That said, the law relating to unjustified threats is complex and none of the above affects the importance of seeking advice prior to sending correspondence that could be construed as a threat of infringement proceedings in relation to an intellectual property right.
If you require further information on anything covered in this briefing, please contact Mark Caddle (email@example.com; 44 20 7940 3600) or your usual contact at the firm. This publication is a general summary of the law. It should not replace legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances.
© Withers & Rogers LLP, November 2017